Monday, February 24, 2020

The fan (1995)




- The fan. Peter Abrahams. Bobby Rayburn, baseball superstar. Just starting the season at a new team. A baseball god. Too bad he’s about to hit a slump. Gil Renard, ardent fan. Merrily reminiscing the glories of the past. Too bad he’s about to be faced with the harsh realities of his life. Star and fan, the cycle of celebrity life —too bad it’s about to become a kiss of death. 

When I got “The fan”, the 70’s thriller by Bob Randall, in a used bookstore, this one was right next to it —and on a whim I decided to get both. Two books with the same title and premise, but decades apart. In one the celebrity being stalked is an actress, in the other a sportsman. Coincidence, or rather, it’s a theme that persists because boy, bad fandom behavior has been around for so much longer than we think. It’s the specifics that vary. Perhaps it would make a good comparison exercise, I thought, reading these two thrillers back to back. See what if anything changes from 70’s to 90’s mass market thrillers. 

Oh, of note: Both books were adapted to a movie. The 70’s one was a flop upon release, but has since gained cult status. The 90’s one was pretty terrible by all reports. But I have seen neither movie, so I really can’t confirm or deny their respective quality. 

What I can say is this: Abrahams' thriller is in so many ways on par with Randall’s and in so many ways far less effective. 

Let’s start with the ‘less’: Where Randall’s use of the epistolary format helped keep his tale moving at a brisk pace and to cram in a ton of subtle character development in only a few choice paragraphs, Abrahams takes his sweet time. Not sure if this counts as a spoiler, but: The two main characters do not really cross paths until we’re past the 300-page mark. Before that it’s just the briefest of interactions. As a thriller, it would be easy to dismiss this book as having far too much buildup for far too little pay-off and just not enough suspense.

And yet. 

And yet —it is still quite a surprise, and the patience necessary to navigate this book does pay off. Truth be told the book is much more of a character study with chilling suggestions than a suspense novel per se. But what a character study! Bobby and Gil are both horribly detached people, just one far more sunk into delusion than the other. Admittedly this risks making the novel entirely unsympathetic —it is saved by the late arrival of a third protagonist. Jewel, a middle-aged reporter, and a fairly unusual heroine for this kind of story (I hear the movie basically cut this character’s heroic deeds, which might explain why it bombed). 

It’s a story with a very high bodycount, but the narrative eye is not interested in the carnage —it’s interested in the psychological violence. In Gil’s thorough clinging to his dreams, his insistence of blaming everybody in his life for his own failures except himself, his borderline homoerotic fascination with Rayburn. He doesn’t just get physically close to his baseball star on a few occasions, he makes sure to be close enough to smell him. He remembers his glory days so vividly that when we learn exactly how old he was at the time, it’s a genuine kick in the gut. He is the nightmare that the myth of the ‘American Dream’ produces —a boiling cauldron of white male entitlement that every so often explodes in the most humiliating ways. Then there is Rayburn, the celebrity consumed by superstitions, considered too old for his profession at thirty-one. The super-player who dearly wishes that his equally talented son will never, ever, become a baseball player like himself. He has seen the reality behind the glamorous mask of sports celebrity and it is horrific. Yet Rayburn himself can be quite unlikeable as well —not very bright, far less compassionate and sensitive than he thinks he is —and baffled when his encounter with Jewel makes him see a fundamental flaw: She is a woman; he is in so many ways still a boy. 

Jewel (nee Janine) has less page time, yet her character resonates even more today. A woman in a ‘boy’s profession’, not only is she permanently second-guessed by her young male co-workers and editors —her relatives so wish she’d trade her awards for a husband, and the police see no reason her research into a dangerous fan should be taken seriously. Why, she’s just a… a… cheerleader with a frump, they think! But Jewel has little time for nonsense like that. She has a story to find and by god, she’ll follow it where she must —even all the way to a dangerous confrontation at night in a cemetery…


This is not a perfect novel, but it is more than worth a look —far better than one might expect, really.

Friday, February 7, 2020

The Fan (1977)




- The Fan. Bob Randall. Broadway star Sally Ross is at the height of her career —some might suggest, about to start declining. As she’s getting ready for a new show, she keeps herself entertained with the antics of her lively secretary, her witty ex-husband, a new boy-toy… oh, yeah, and that really devoted fan who writes almost daily. This fan does seem to think he’s actually more intimate with Sally than he could possibly be. But surely that’s just exaggeration. He can’t possibly be one of those deranged fanatics you hear about on the news… right..?

Excellent epistolary thriller. While the story is something you have heard a million times, it’s all in the execution. Vivid characters, taut suspense, and the author’s talent for playing with the readers’ expectations all keep it afloat. Randall is no Ira Levin but boy, does he come close in the best moments. 

What stays with one about this book, reading it in 2020, is not only how the subject remains sadly relevant, but how this late 70’s book completely destroys certain clichés we have come to expect from the genre. But it’s not because of subversions: It’s because the story feels grounded in reality. Specifically, this stalker is no evil genius constantly out-smarting the police. He is an ordinary entitled, hateful man. Even his earlier letters already hint at the level of delusion he’s submerged in, and as the story advances he quickly reveals all of the prejudices one has come to expect from his type —he is violently homophobic, quite racist, the kind of young white man who is convinced he is owed everything by women, and flies off the handle every time he’s reminded that they do not. 

He does keep escaping —because the police, also like in real life, simply do not take threats (particularly against women and minorities) all that seriously until it is far too late and too much damage has already been done. It can be at once humorous and chilling to see how much time they spend combing New York for a “Douglas Green” when he signs his letters “Douglas Breen” and his early letters came with his full address!! 

But also like in a Levin thriller, the dark comedy of manners slowly becomes a chiller, all the way to the kind of brutal kick-in-the-gut twist ending that is so characteristic of 70’s genre fiction. 


This was Randall’s debut novel (it’s so well crafted, you really couldn’t tell), and hopefully the start of a good career (he has a few other genre titles, but I have yet to read any of them). Quite recommended. 

Friday, January 31, 2020

Dead Girls




- Dead Girls. Alice Bolin. Collection of essays covering a wide variety of topics (Noir stories, celebrities, life in L.A., the autobiographical essay genre, tales of witches and monsters) with which Bolin interrogates the American (USian) fascination with the figure of the Dead Girl as a totem to both revere and use to convenience. Subtitled “Essays on surviving an American obsession”, these fourteen pieces slowly metamorphose from literary criticism to personal attempts at explaining one’s conception of self and time. 

Bolin’s prose is a delight to read. Like the best essays, it is both critique and invitation to read (or watch) for oneself, slowly untangling a complex webs of associations —and from there, jumping to what certain books and movies and celebrities mean to Bolin herself as both writer and woman. At times a coming-of-age narrative (that questions the very nature of coming-of-age tales), at others a critique of deeply entrenched American obsessions (sexy but virginal girls, powerful men), Bolin’s essays ponder all subjects, from Joan Didion to Britney Spears, with admirable tenacity. 

As an essayist, she is also acutely aware of the limitations both of her totemic artists and of herself. As the book progresses, the narrative becomes increasingly aware of her own identity as a young white American woman, with all the good and bad it carries —the sometimes painful awareness of both privilege and barriers. 

It is hard to choose a favorite essay or section in the book, as all analyze certain repeating motifs (gender, place, identity, the act of narrating) to various effects. 


Very recommended. 

What did Jack do?




- What did Jack do? (2016-2020. Dir. David Lynch. Short). A detective interrogates a talking capuchin monkey in a café. Your response to the previous summary may depend on how familiar you are with director Lynch’s oeuvre (or perhaps with Furry stories). 

A short film that is hard to classify, crossing from Noir narratives to a parody of same, to art film, to a purely… Lynch film experience. 

For those viewers who are already fans of Lynch (myself included) there is all the expected ingredients: Imaginative settings that suggest more than they show, carefully measured performances (two human actors and two animals, one with a superimposed mouth), a twisting storyline that reveals itself oh-so-gradually —even a musical moment that provides a capital clue! 

For fans, too, it is tempting to see this short as fitting in with what we imagine to be Lynch’s ‘cinematic universe’. Quite a few suggest that the detective, played by the director himself, is Gordon Cole from his infamous tv series “Twin Peaks”. The answer of course, is: Maybe and maybe not. What really matters is the film itself. The hypnotic, impossible to classify film. 

Of course, people who dislike Lynch’s works will find everything to criticize that they already dislike about them. A disjointed, seemingly random dialogue and a story that is somehow simultaneously common and inane. Many would have found it pretentious… if the short itself didn’t refuse to take itself seriously. 


Really the best way to describe this short film is to urge people to watch it, and decide for themselves. 

Monday, January 6, 2020

2019: Comics (and one animation).


ANIMATION: 

- Carole & Tuesday. My favorite Anime (and in general, cartoon) of this year, a show about two street musicians trying to make it big. The expected musical sequences are a definite highlight, as is the sci-fi setting. 



COMICS: 

- Drama. Raina Tegelmeier. One of the best YA coming-of-age comic book stories you have seen yet. And with an important queer plot, to boot! 



WEBCOMICS: 

For these, I’ll give a link and a small sample —I invite you all to give each of these a try. They aren’t all for all tastes, and yet…

















Next: Entries in Spanish. 

2019: Top 5 tv shows.

LIVE-ACTION TV

5. Slasher: Solstice

The most brutal of all tv homages to slasher movies returns! Continuing the blood-soaked style that the previous “The executioner” and “Guilty Party” tales established, “Solstice” mixes brutal murders with surprisingly poignant critiques of modern dehumanization. From cyberbullying to radicalization, all with a heavy dose of gore. 

Evidently not for everyone, but quite a treat for devoted genre fans. 



4. She’s Gotta Have It (season 2) / Dear White People (season 3). 

A tie! Which is surely fitting, giving the real-life backstage rivalry between both show runners. 

Yet both are shows studying the modern lives of African-American young adults —through a delightfully meta textual lens. 

“She’s gotta have it” is, like most of show runner Spike Lee’s ouevre, often problematic. Both in ways that are fully intended as provocation… and in completely unintended ways. The result of Lee having simply become too old and grouchy for some of the subjects this show attempts to tackle (and the issues his productions always had). Yet it’s saved by the sheer charisma of the wonderful cast. 



Meanwhile, “Dear White People” continues to challenge expectations, this time changing the format. It also delivers one of the best gay male storylines on tv yet. 



3. The politician

Terrific satire with all the ingredients you would expect from a Ryan Murphy production —except that this one has a heart, which makes for all the difference. An hilarious, often puzzling comedy that, while not for everyone, is more than worth a look. 



2. Tales of the city (2019 version).

The latest entry of this long-running series is one of the best queer shows I have seen yet. While the sometimes glacial pace requires patience, the pay-offs are quite worth it. I hope to watch all previous entries soon. 



1. Pose (season 1). 


Another Murphy production, and another terrific Queer show! Set in the 80’s trans scene, and quite gleefully showing everything that nostalgia-fueled shows like ‘Stranger Things’ never would, at it’s heart it’s a show about finding the strength to be yourself. The underground fashion club sequences alone are more than worth checking the whole show out for. 



Next: Comics (and one animation)

2019: Top 5 movies.

Simply five movies, tv shows, and webcomics that stood out to me last year. Not necessarily my personal favorites and not necessarily the best in terms of craft, but rather five that I want to re-visit someday and that I’d recommend for a variety of reasons. 

Sadly, no books in English stood out to me this year. And of animation and comics, only one of each. 

Beyond that, they are arranged in order of preference. 

MOVIES 

* Runner-up: Casting JonBenet. (2017, dir. Kitty Green). 

Dramatization of a real-life unsolved murder —or rather, an extensive documentary about the difficultly of casting the actors for said dramatization. 

Truth be told, this movie is included here solely for the dazzling achievement that is the very final scene: Not the dramatization of the murder, as one would expect, but instead a run-through of *every* actor cast running their lines, simultaneously playing myriad versions of the same characters. The effect manages to transform the banal into pure surrealism, and then subtly critiques the very genre the movie supposedly adscribes to, the crime docu. Sometimes, the power of fiction far outweighs that of reality. 



5. Rocketman. (2019, dir. Dexter Fletcher)

Biography of Elton John, notable mainly for being the first mainstream Hollywood production with on-screen gay sex. The requisite musical numbers are a sight to behold as well. The accuracy to real life is, as in the previous entry, not as important. 



4. Nocturnal Animals. (2016. dir. Tom Ford)

Simultaneously a ‘rape-and-revenge’ thriller and a domestic drama. The ultimately misogynist storyline would sink this movie based on a best-seller —were it not also one of the movies to best capture the intensity of the act of reading itself, and of our tendency to seek clues to our life in fiction. 



3. The lobster. (Ireland. 2015, dir. Yorgos Lanthimos)

Unpredictable sci-fi dystopia that subverts expectations at every turn. Includes one of the best uses of the seemingly omniscient narrator. Like the best entries of genre fiction, it relies less on special effects than on clever acting to sell it’s seemingly far-fetched concepts. 



2. Can you ever forgive me? (2018, dir. Marielle Heller)

Loosely based on real-life book forgery case, this black humored satire is at once a subtle queer drama and an indictment of ruthless publishing houses. The performances make the script soar. 



1. Us. (2019, dir. Jordan Peele)

Peele’s follow-up to his surprise hit “Get out” is another innovative, clever horror movie that brings a fresh spin to a common topic of the genre. This time around, the subject of doppelgängers is used to bring a chilling parable about the nature of identity, wrapped in the skin of a wonderful thriller. Capped off with a terrific climax that more than one critic failed to understand. As usual. 




Next: TV shows.